<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hilbert on Marginalia</title><link>https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/tags/hilbert/</link><description>Recent content in Hilbert on Marginalia</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/tags/hilbert/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Social History of "Operators" in Mathematics</title><link>https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/posts/operator-social-history/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/posts/operator-social-history/</guid><description>A chronological, social-intellectual history of how “operators” moved from being informal calculation procedures (differentiate, integrate, take differences) to fully legitimate mathematical objects with their own algebra, classification, and theories. The essay tracks the reification of actions into entities through notation, pedagogy, and disciplinary conflict: early operational calculus and the symbolic D; the 19th-century rise of matrices and linear transformations; debates between quaternionists and vector analysts; engineers’ pragmatic operator methods (notably Heaviside) versus demands for rigor; and the early 20th-century consolidation of operator theory inside functional analysis (Fredholm, Hilbert, Riesz), culminating in the central role of operators in modern physics and computation.</description></item><item><title>The Semantics of "Geometry" from Euler to Today</title><link>https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/posts/geometry-semantics/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sguzman.github.io/marginalia/posts/geometry-semantics/</guid><description>This report traces the evolving meanings of &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; in European and American mathematics from the era of Leonhard Euler (18th century) to the present day. Over nearly three centuries, &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; has expanded from denoting the classical study of shapes and Euclidean space to a sprawling family of subfields and methodologies. We examine what mathematicians of each era understood &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; to mean, how new theories and external pressures reshaped those meanings, and how &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; functioned both as a subject area and a style of reasoning. Key transitions include the rise of analytic and coordinate methods, the introduction of projective and non-Euclidean geometries, the 19th-century unification of geometry via transformation groups (Klein&amp;rsquo;s Erlangen Program), the axiomatization of geometry by Hilbert, the 20th-century branching into differential, topological, algebraic, and computational geometries, and the influence of physics and computing. We also explore enduring tensions&amp;mdash;synthetic vs. analytic methods, intuition vs. rigor, local vs. global perspectives, continuous vs. discrete structures, algebraic vs. geometric mindsets&amp;mdash;and how the term &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; at times unified mathematicians and at other times fragmented into specialized &amp;ldquo;geometries.&amp;rdquo; Through historical narrative, case studies, and quotations from major figures, we show how &amp;ldquo;geometry&amp;rdquo; evolved from the study of tangible figures in Euclidean space to a unifying language of mathematical structure, and why it remains a plurality of approaches today.</description></item></channel></rss>